7 Tips for Choosing the Right Onscreen Marking Software in 2024

7 Tips for choosing the right Onscreen Marking Software in 2024


Technology is increasingly pivotal in enhancing critical operations such as examination management within universities and educational institutions. Recent trends reveal a notable shift towards the adoption of on-screen marking software, aimed at streamlining the evaluation of answer sheets. 

Statistics indicate that the use of digital marking systems can reduce grading time by up to 50% and significantly decrease administrative costs associated with traditional paper-based methods. 

On-screen marking systems digitize physical answer sheets, allowing examiners and moderators to assess them securely from any location. 


This innovation eliminates the logistical challenges of managing physical documents and the need for personnel to travel to secure examination centers for evaluation. By transforming the evaluation process, on-screen marking not only enhances efficiency but also promises substantial cost savings in post-examination activities and result processing.

This article aims to guide you through the essential considerations in selecting on-screen marking software, highlighting seven critical aspects to consider. We will delve into what features are crucial, the questions you should pose to potential providers, and the vital security measures to ensure a successful implementation.

Let’s embark on this journey to understand how to choose the right on-screen marking software for your needs.

Understanding Onscreen Marking Software

Now, let’s delve into the concept of on-screen marking software. Essentially, this software offers a systematic process for digitizing physical copies of answer sheets.

Large institutions or universities, which deal with thousands of students, often need to conduct exams on a semester, yearly, or even quarterly basis. Evaluating thousands of answer booklets physically can be quite a challenge, as examiners are required to visit specific exam centers to assess these sheets.

With the help of on-screen marking software, all physical copies of answer sheets can be digitized and stored in a digital format. Examiners or moderators are then provided with a secure online interface through which they can easily evaluate these digital copies.

Online Answer Checker

The software offers various features, such as automated score calculation and understanding optional subjects or compulsory question patterns. Additionally, it can automatically mark blank pages.

By providing a seamless user interface, on-screen marking software significantly reduces evaluation time and eliminates the need for examiners to travel to exam centers. This saves considerable logistical effort and resources. Overall, the accuracy of evaluations can be drastically improved with the aid of on-screen marking software.

Register For a Demo

7 Tips for Choosing the Right Onscreen Marking Software in 2024

7 Tips for Choosing the Right Onscreen Marking Software in 2024

Tip 1 – Assess Your Needs

Before diving into the selection of the appropriate software for your needs, it’s crucial to assess your organization’s specific requirements. Engage in internal discussions to determine which software is best suited for your situation. Consider factors such as the volume of students, types of assessments conducted, and integration with existing systems.

For instance, you may be using a system to print student results or publishing them through a specific ERP system. It’s essential to comprehend the current methodology of scoring calculations and the overall process involved in evaluating answer sheets. Taking these factors into account will help you identify your needs related to an on-screen marking solution.

It’s always wise to document your workflow associated with the answer sheet evaluation process. The chosen software should be capable of mapping your existing workflow within the online system. Assess your needs concerning specific dashboards, such as real-time information about the status of answer sheet evaluations or overall progress.

Additionally, consider whether you need the flexibility to assign answer sheets to other examiners during the evaluation phase and if the software can handle such complexities or workflows. Evaluating these aspects beforehand will ensure you select the right on-screen marking software for your organization.

Tip 2 – Check for Usability and Interface Design

A crucial element of an on-screen marking system is its user-friendly interface design. After all, user-friendliness plays a significant role in efficiency and adoption rates. With potentially hundreds or even thousands of examiners and moderators using the system, they must find it easy and intuitive, requiring minimal time to learn the ropes.

As such, user-friendliness should be your top priority when selecting on-screen marking software. To cater to various users, the software should be compatible with different operating systems, browsers, and resolutions. Evaluating answer sheets online should be a breeze, and comprehensive training videos or support must be provided for examiners while using the system.

To gauge usability, consider conducting a mock evaluation process with the software. This will offer valuable insight into how your examiners interact with the system while evaluating answer sheets online. Additionally, don’t hesitate to suggest minor changes to enhance the software’s efficiency, enabling examiners to complete their tasks more swiftly.

In summary, when choosing an on-screen marking system, prioritize usability and interface design as key selection criteria for your educational institution.

Tip 3 – Evaluate Security Features

The emphasis on data security and privacy in educational software cannot be overstated. As educational institutions increasingly incorporate digital technologies and software systems into their operations, particularly in the realms of teaching, learning, and examination processes, the safeguarding of sensitive information becomes paramount.

The integrity of examination results and the protection of personal data are not just operational necessities but are crucial for maintaining the trust and confidence of students, educators, and stakeholders in the educational ecosystem.

In this context, the evaluation of security features within educational software, especially on-screen marking systems, is critical. Such systems, which handle vast amounts of sensitive data including student information, examination questions, and results, are prime targets for cyber threats. A breach in such a system could not only disrupt the educational process but also lead to significant privacy violations.

One of the foremost considerations should be encryption. Encryption ensures that data, both at rest and in transit, is encoded in such a way that only authorized parties can access it. For instance, the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is a widely recognized encryption protocol that offers a high level of security.

Implementing strong encryption protocols guards against unauthorized data interception, making it a fundamental aspect of any educational software’s security framework.

Moreover, data protection measures extend beyond encryption. These include secure access controls, such as role-based access mechanisms, which ensure that only individuals with the necessary authorization can access or modify sensitive information.

Regulations set the standard for privacy and data protection in educational settings, mandating measures like consent for data collection, a clear purpose for data processing, and the right for individuals to access or delete their information.

The importance of these security measures is underscored by statistics.

According to a report by the IBM Security and Ponemon Institute, the average cost of a data breach in the education sector was approximately $3.9 million in 2020, highlighting the financial impact in addition to the reputational damage and loss of trust.

Furthermore, a survey by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) indicated that nearly 60% of educational institutions experienced a cyber incident in the previous year, with ransomware attacks being particularly prevalent.

In addition to robust encryption and data protection measures, educational institutions should also assess the software’s capabilities in disaster recovery and continuous data backup. These mechanisms ensure that, in the event of a security breach or other disruptions, data is not permanently lost and can be restored, thus maintaining the continuity of educational processes.

To conclude, evaluating the security features of educational software is a multi-faceted process that requires a thorough examination of encryption protocols, data protection measures, regulatory compliance, and disaster recovery capabilities.

By prioritizing these aspects, educational institutions can safeguard their digital environments against cyber threats, thereby protecting the privacy and security of their data and upholding their commitment to the trust and safety of their educational community.

Tip 4 – Consider Scalability

When considering the scalability of software within educational institutions or any organization that deals with assessments, the importance cannot be overstated. As your institution grows, so does the complexity of managing an increasing number of students, examiners, and assessments.

The ability of software to scale effectively is not just a feature but a necessity for sustaining growth and ensuring efficiency. In this context, the focus on scalability within on-screen marking systems becomes crucial. These systems must not only accommodate growth but do so in a way that maintains, if not improves, the quality and speed of evaluation processes.

Understanding Scalability

Scalability refers to the capacity of a system to handle a growing amount of work or its potential to be enlarged to accommodate that growth.

For educational institutions, this means having software that can support an increasing number of students and assessments without degradation in performance or user experience. The goal is to have a system that grows with your institution, avoiding bottlenecks that could hinder progress or the educational process itself.

The Necessity for Scalable On-screen Marking Systems

On-screen marking systems represent a significant advancement in the way educational assessments are conducted. However, as the number of examiners and students increases, these systems are put to the test.

The ability to perform thousands of concurrent evaluations without downtime is not just desirable but essential. Downtime or performance issues can have cascading effects, from delayed grading to impacting the fairness and integrity of the assessment process.

Statistics show that institutions adopting scalable solutions can better manage their resources, leading to more efficient operations.

For instance, a scalable on-screen marking system can reduce the turnaround time for exam results by up to 50%, significantly improving the student experience and institutional reputation.

The Importance of Concurrent Evaluation Capability

One of the critical features of a scalable on-screen marking system is its ability to handle concurrent evaluations. This means that thousands of examiners can evaluate answer sheets simultaneously without causing performance bottlenecks.

Such capability is crucial during peak examination periods, when the system’s resilience is tested the most. A system that can manage this level of concurrency ensures that the marking process is smooth, timely, and free from technical glitches that could compromise the assessment’s integrity.

Choosing the Right Solution

Selecting the right on-screen marking software requires careful consideration of its scalability. Before committing to a solution, institutions should rigorously test the software under conditions that mimic peak usage times. This includes assessing the system’s ability to handle a significant number of concurrent evaluations and its performance stability under such stress.

extensive reports of onscreen marking

Look for providers who are transparent about their system’s capabilities and who can provide concrete data or case studies demonstrating scalability. Furthermore, consider the provider’s commitment to continuous improvement and updates, as this indicates their dedication to maintaining scalability over time.

Tip 5 – Explore Integration Capabilities

The seamless integration of on-screen marking solutions with other educational tools and systems cannot be overstated in its importance. In an educational landscape increasingly reliant on technology, the ability to integrate software solutions becomes paramount.

This interoperability is crucial for streamlining processes, enhancing efficiency, and ensuring a cohesive educational experience for both educators and learners.

The Importance of Integration

Educational institutions use a myriad of software systems, including Learning Management Systems (LMS), Student Information Systems (SIS), Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, and various digital tools for assessment and administration.

The on-screen marking solution you choose must be capable of integrating smoothly with these existing platforms. This compatibility is essential for automating data transfer, minimizing manual data entry, and ensuring accuracy and security in the handling of sensitive information.

Statistics underscore the significance of integration capabilities in educational technology.

According to a survey conducted by Educause, a nonprofit organization aiming to advance higher education through the use of IT, over 83% of educational institutions prioritize software integration capabilities when selecting new technologies.

This high percentage reflects a widespread recognition of the operational efficiencies and data management improvements that integrated systems offer.

Checking for Compatibility

When evaluating an on-screen marking solution, it is vital to assess its compatibility with your institution’s existing software ecosystems. Key considerations should include:

  • LMS Compatibility: The solution should seamlessly integrate with the LMS in use, facilitating the import and export of grades, feedback, and other assessment-related data.
  • SIS Integration: A smooth link to the SIS ensures that student records, including personal information, enrollment details, and academic history, are accurately reflected and easily accessible.
  • Digital Tools and ERP Systems: The on-screen marking solution should work hand in glove with ERP systems for administrative and financial management, as well as other digital assessment tools, enhancing the overall functionality and efficiency of the educational technology infrastructure.

Additionally, the ability to support various APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) for custom integrations is a significant plus. This flexibility allows for tailored solutions that meet the unique needs of an educational institution, further enhancing the utility and effectiveness of the on-screen marking solution.

The Benefits of a Well-Integrated System

The advantages of a well-integrated on-screen marking solution are manifold:

The Benefits of a Well-Integrated System
  • Reduced Data Entry: By automating the transfer of information between systems, institutions can significantly reduce the time and resources spent on manual data entry, lowering the risk of errors.
  • Enhanced Data Accuracy and Security: Integrated systems improve the accuracy of data across platforms and enhance the security of sensitive information through streamlined processes and reduced manual handling.
  • Improved Efficiency: Educators and administrators can access and manage information more quickly and easily, freeing up time for teaching, learning, and other core activities.
  • Better Decision Making: With comprehensive and accurate data readily available, educational leaders can make more informed decisions about curriculum development, resource allocation, and strategic planning.

In conclusion, the integration capabilities of on-screen marking solutions are not just a technical requirement but a strategic asset that can significantly impact the operational effectiveness and educational quality of institutions. As such, ensuring compatibility with existing systems and leveraging the benefits of integrated educational technologies is crucial for modern educational environments.

Tip 6 – Look for Customization Options

Customization in software, especially within on-screen marking systems, is not just a luxury but a necessity for educational institutions and organizations striving for efficiency and precision in their assessment processes.

The ability to tailor software to meet specific organizational needs significantly enhances the marking process, making it more adaptable, efficient, and insightful.

Apart from customization in workflow, software should be able to provide custom reports as well. Now a days AI can be integrated with the system to generate intelligent reports as per institute requirement.

Why Customization Matters

In the realm of educational assessment, one size does not fit all. Each institution has its unique set of requirements, goals, and challenges. Customization options in marking software allow for a tailored approach that can accommodate diverse marking schemes, templates, and reporting needs.

This adaptability ensures that the software can evolve with the institution, supporting changes in curriculum, assessment standards, and reporting requirements over time.

Enhancing the Marking Process

Customization can profoundly impact the effectiveness of the marking process. For instance, flexible marking schemes enable educators to align evaluation methods with learning outcomes, ensuring a more accurate assessment of student performance.

Custom templates can streamline the creation of exams and assignments, saving valuable time and resources. Moreover, advanced reporting options allow for the generation of detailed insights into student performance, helping educators identify trends, gaps, and areas for improvement.

Meeting Organizational Needs

Beyond the marking process itself, customization can address broader organizational needs. For example, the ability to download custom reports facilitates data-driven decision-making, allowing institutions to adapt strategies and resources to better meet educational objectives.

Additionally, integration capabilities with existing AI systems and educational technology platforms can enhance the efficiency and scope of on-screen marking systems, enabling a more cohesive and comprehensive approach to examination management.

Looking for Software with Customization Options?

When selecting an on-screen marking system, it’s crucial to seek out software that offers robust customization options. Consider the following:

Looking for Software with Customization Options?
  • Flexible Marking Schemes: Ensure the software supports various grading scales, rubrics, and evaluation methods.
  • Custom Templates: Look for the ability to create and modify templates for tests, assignments, and reports.
  • Advanced Reporting: The software should offer comprehensive reporting tools, allowing for the customization of data presentation and analysis.
  • Integration Capabilities: A good system should seamlessly integrate with existing educational technologies and AI systems, enhancing functionality and data utility.

The Importance of Customization: By the Numbers

Statistics underscore the importance of customization in educational technology.

A study found that institutions utilizing customizable software solutions reported a 30% increase in efficiency in examination management processes.

Moreover, schools that leveraged custom reporting capabilities observed a 25% improvement in the identification of student learning gaps, leading to targeted interventions and enhanced educational outcomes.

Customization of on-screen marking software is not just about meeting current needs; it’s about future-proofing educational assessment processes. As technology evolves and educational standards shift, the ability to adapt and customize will be key to maintaining relevance, efficiency, and effectiveness in the assessment and learning journey.

Tip 7 – Get References and Request Demos

In the digital age, selecting the right on-screen marketing system is not just about understanding the features and pricing; it’s about comprehending the practical application and effectiveness of the software in real-world settings.

One critical step in this process is to obtain references and request demos. This approach allows you to gauge firsthand how the software performs in environments similar to yours and to understand the challenges and successes other users have encountered.

Reference Checks: The Value of Real-World Insights

When considering an on-screen marketing system, conducting reference checks is invaluable. By reaching out to vendors for references, you can connect with other organizations in your domain—such as educational institutions, universities, and examination boards—that are currently using the system.

This direct line of communication provides a platform for discussing the software’s real-world applications, including workflow challenges and benefits.

For instance, a study by Software Advice found that nearly 85% of users consider customer references crucial before making a purchase decision, underscoring the importance of hearing about other users’ experiences.

Engaging with references offers several advantages. It allows you to:

  • Understand how the software addresses specific needs in your domain.
  • Learn about the software’s reliability and scalability from those who have firsthand experience.
  • Gain insights into the vendor’s support and customer service quality.

Requesting Demonstrations: Seeing is Believing

Requesting a demo is another essential step in the selection process. Demonstrations provide a hands-on look at how the on-screen marketing system works, offering a glimpse into its usability, features, and integration capabilities.

By involving various end-users—such as examiners, moderators, and administrative staff—in the demo, you can assess the system’s practicality and feasibility from multiple perspectives.

Involvement of stakeholders in the demonstration process:

  • Facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the software’s capabilities.
  • Helps identify any potential issues or limitations from the viewpoint of different users.
  • Allows you to evaluate the ease of use and the learning curve for staff members.

Furthermore, incorporating various stakeholders in the demo process ensures that the software meets the diverse needs of your department or organization.

According to a report by FinancesOnline, organizations that involve multiple stakeholders in the software selection process are 35% more likely to report satisfaction with their choice.

Register For a Demo

The Bottom Line

The process of selecting the right on-screen marking system is significantly enhanced by conducting thorough reference checks and requesting comprehensive demonstrations.

These steps provide invaluable insights into the software’s performance in similar environments, its ability to meet specific needs, and the quality of support provided by the vendor.

By leveraging the experiences of current users and witnessing the software in action, decision-makers are better equipped to choose a system that will effectively meet their needs and contribute to their organization’s success.

Engaging with references and seeing the software firsthand ultimately leads to more informed, confident decisions in the selection of an on-screen marketing system.

I am extremely happy to have worked with Eklavvya. The platform is user-friendly and cost-effective, which made it an excellent choice for our needs.

We are thrilled with the partnership and the improved technology and processes that Eklavvya has brought. I highly recommend Eklavvya for anyone seeking a reliable and efficient platform.

Ashish Apte,Controller of Examination (NMIMS University)

Ashish Apte,

Controller of Examination (NMIMS University)

Eklavvya’s onscreen evaluation system is a mature product and it helped our university to ensure that all milestones of the answer sheet evaluation project were achieved without any issues.

Our university is able to complete the entire activity with result declaration in record time with high efficiency. Our faculty found this system efficient & user user-friendly.

Mr. Shantilal Ghalme

Mr. Shantilal T. Ghalme,

Controller of Examinations, Indira College of Commerce and Science

Register For a Demo